You Know You Are A True Believer, If You As An Adult Still Believe In HCAs (Hidden Causal Agents).

A blog for people who, like myself, have seen that True Believers engaged in magical & (pseudo)religious thinking usually suffer from some kind of delusional disorder due to cerebral dysfunctions/malfunctions and/or abnormal neural connectivity patterns in their brains.

Friday, August 21, 2015

Explanatory Theories of Religion (by Cris Campbell)


Have a look at  Explanatory Theories of Religion ( http://genealogyreligion.net/explanatory-theories-of-religion ). I found that article on Cris Campbell's blog. 



There are many explanatory and evolutionary theories of how magical and religious thoughts (and different religions) emerged among our ancestors.

In this reblogged article we can read about Cris Campbell's take on that topic. 

Cris holds advanced degrees in anthropology, philosophy, and law. He's apparently very interested in the origin of magical and religious thoughts. And he obviously knows a lot - and I really mean a great deal; he's a scholar! -  about the many hypotheses and theories that try to explain how it became possible for our ancestors to invent divine spiritual beings of different kinds.

His blog readers get a very good resume of how this "religification process" may have looked like. Here are some quotes taken from Cris Campbell's blog article:

This is not, of course, a simple question and no single theory provides a definitive answer. Since 1990 (i.e., the beginning of the modern era of evolutionary theorizing about religion), scholars have proposed so many different varieties of “cognitive byproduct” and “social adaptive” theories that simply surveying, sorting, and analyzing them is a considerable challenge. Synthesizing them is an even greater challenge and, given their differing premises, may be impossible.
[...]

Seeking clarity, last year I decided to conduct an intensive review of all previous theories (i.e., those predating 1990) that could variously be characterized as: (1) explanatory, (2) developmental, and/or (3) evolutionary. The latter category can be confusing because many scholars working within a post-Darwinian evolutionary paradigm tend to conflate biological withcultural evolution. Such scholars may also prefer non-Darwinian explanations, but they are still working within an evolutionary or developmental paradigm. When this occurs, I refer to them as “evolutionist.”

My richly rewarding review resulted in a great deal of writing, most of which has appeared here in scattered posts over the past year. Now that the review is nearly finished, I want to gather all those posts and links on a single page. The theorists are listed mostly in chronological order of their appearance. I chose this arrangement not just for convenience. One thing I discovered is that the scholars working within the developmental-evolutionist tradition were fully aware of previous work and were responding to their predecessors or contemporaries. If you read these scholars’ original works in serial order, you will find yourself eavesdropping on a brilliant conversation that lasted for well over 100 years.


BTW, here's an interesting TED Talk video:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c7vH4rgdmxw . 

The speaker is Yuval Noah Harari, author of the book "Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind". For a short review of that book, have a look at http://www.theguardian.com/books/2014/sep/21/sapiens-brief-history-mankind-review-yuval-noah-harari 

Harari suggests that our ancestors became "human" when they acquired the ability to think in symbolic "terms", i.e. to create imaginary realities and not only accept the physically real reality. 

As an atheist I especially like Harari's take on money and gods. Suggest to a chimp that if he gives me one of his bananas, I'll give him some paper money in return, and the chimp would, maybe, wonder if you've gone insane. 

The same thing goes for gods and heavens. If you pay tithes to your church, your priest/minister promises you that he'll do all he can to help you entering Heaven through its Pearly Gates. 

A chimp would NEVER buy that concept, that imaginary and creative symbolic idea. (Neither would I, but many religious fellow humans seem to accept that kind of deal without any hesitation at all. How about you?)


Posted by Helmer von Helvete at 10:40 AM 1 comment:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest

Tuesday, August 18, 2015

Rosa Rubicondior: So I've Written This Book...

Rosa Rubicondior: So I've Written This Book...



https://bbnewsblog.wordpress.com/2015/08/17/extra-extra-read-all-about-it-rosa-rubicondior-has-written-and-published-a-book-entitled-the-light-of-reason-and-other-atheist-writing/



Extra! Extra! Read all about it! Rosa Rubicondior has written and published a book entitled The Light of Reason: And Other Atheist Writing.

Rosa Rubicondior: So I’ve Written This Book….
At last!
In response to numerous requests, Rosa Rubicondior has finally produced an ebook, based on a selection of her Atheism and Science blogs. The inspiring title is “The Light Of Reason: And Other Atheist Writing”.
I’m darn sure this ebook will enlighten many atheists’s lives.
The articles are arranged into four sections, each dealing with a different aspect of Atheism and science and the interface between science and religion.
Those sections are:
#1: Religion and Atheism, which looks at the reasons why Atheism is the position of choice for critical thinkers and people who allow the evidence to determine their beliefs and who suspend judgement in the absence of evidence.
#2: Evolution and Other Science, which deals with aspects of science which normally feature in creationist and other religious apologetics and about which most creationists are ignorant or at least feign ignorance.

#3: Religious Apologetics, dealing with the common apologetic fallacies (and believe me, there are plenty of them to be ridiculed.

#4: Silly Bible, exposing the utter nonsense and implausibility of the stories found throughout the Bible.
I believe section #4 will become my personal favorite part of Rosa’s ebook since the Bible (a.k.a. the Holy Scripture) is really a silly book, with lots of even more stupid narratives – like the talking (and maybe lisping) and upright walking Serpent in the Garden of Eden. 
Hey, hold the horses! Wait a sec. An upright walking Snake? Yes, obviously it must have been that way; i.e. after the Fall God seemingly felt revengeful (although what happened in the Garden of Eden couldn’t have come as a surprise to Him) and therefore commanded all snakes from now on to become crawling reptiles on the ground. Otherwise it’s very hard to understand and accept what can be read in Genesis 3:14: And the LORD God said to the serpent, Because you have done this, you are cursed above all cattle, and above every beast of the field; on your belly shall you go, and dust shall you eat all the days of your life:” 
(Hence, before that the snakes weren’t crawling on the ground.) 
Back now to Rosa’s ebook. There is no plot to follow in it, so so the table of contents each article can be read independently of the others. 
Click the link above to get more information about Rosa Rubicondior’s ebook. 
I haven’t yet bought Rosa’s ebook, so the table of contents is unknown to me. But I’m pretty sure this article will be included,http://rosarubicondior.blogspot.se/2015/04/origin-of-adam-eve-myth.html .

And maybe also this one:http://rosarubicondior.blogspot.se/2012/06/why-gods-first-words-to-adam-was-lie.html . 
The Kindle version of Rosa’s ebook consists of 747 (!) pages, so you’ll get a lot of knowledge for a small amount of money. Don’t hesitate to buy it. I bet your atheist life will be much funnier to live afterwards, because Rosa Rubicondior is an unusually “divinely” gifted writer.

Posted by Helmer von Helvete at 12:57 PM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest

Tuesday, August 11, 2015

Interested in what OCD means and how this evil disorder affects you and your life?

Then I'd strongly recommend you to have a look (well, of course not only ONE look) at Ellen's OCD Blog. 

Especially I recommend this newly written article by Ellen, entitled "OCD and I", see:  https://ellensocdblog.wordpress.com/2015/07/28/ocd-and-i/ . 

Just one small caveat. Be sure you've got a handkerchief - or maybe two - at your side because when you read Ellen's text (and for heaven's sake, don miss all the commentaries) you'll get your eyes full of inspirational tears to wipe off.

Here's a quote from the introduction of Ellen's blog "OCD and I":
For as long as I can remember, you have been a part of my life. No matter the time, the location or the season, you were always there, instilling negativity and horror with every step I took. I was haunted by your ever growing existence, yet I clung onto you as if my life depended on it. 
You influenced my every decision, I couldn’t function without your presence. Yes, maybe I could walk down the left side of the pavement without the inevitable consequence of my loved ones dying, but you would slowly trickle those all too familiar thoughts of doubt into my mind. Infecting every corridor of rational thinking and slowly poisoning that small, sacred part of independence I had left. 
Then whispering those all too familiar words, echoing through my being. “What if Ellen, what if.” My internal dialogue screaming at you to stop, but my feet slowly starting to walk. Inching towards the left side of the pavement because I couldn’t take that risk. What if something happened to my family? What if I caused something bad to happen? I could never shut you out.
You followed me through my teenage years, holding me back from being myself. I conformed to your way of thinking, I did exactly what you said. I thought listening to your lies would make everything better. I was stopping the ‘bad’ things from happening wasn’t I? So the why wasn’t I happy? Why wasn’t I able to function? I was masked by the fake sense of reality you had created. Each day surcoming to your lies and trickery. I couldn’t wear what I wanted, I couldn’t eat what I wanted, I couldn’t be who I wanted to be. 
I became you OCD. I lost my identity to you. No longer would I look in the mirror and see Ellen, I would look in the mirror and see OCD. No longer were you that unwanted presence following me, you were me and I couldn’t break free. I had no energy to shove you off anymore, you had me on puppet strings, I was conforming to your every desire. “1, 2, 3, 4. 1, 2, 3, 4. Did you count right? Maybe you didn’t. What. You think you did? Are you sure? Count again. No? I said, COUNT AGAIN.” I saw no escape. I saw no reason to escape. This was my new reality.
You thrived on my weakness. Without resistance, your grip grew stronger. I was suffocated by your veil of deception. Those who cared about me felt helpless. I had built up walls higher than even I could see. I was treading on egg shells with you OCD. 
One wrong move and I believed my world would come crashing down. One out of line piece of cutlery, one small step to the right. Huge consequences. 
Continue reading at  https://ellensocdblog.wordpress.com/2015/07/28/ocd-and-i/ .
And remember, don't forget the handkerchiefs. (Don't say I didn't warn you...)
Posted by Helmer von Helvete at 2:35 PM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest

Saturday, August 8, 2015

The odd way split-brain patients perceive and experience the world (Video + Stunning articles)

Have a look at this video, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lfGwsAdS9Dc .

If you search for interesting articles about how split brain affects your mind and consciousness, you'll find lots of mind-boggling articles.

Like those:

About 82,500 results (0.47 seconds) 

Search Results

    The split brain: A tale of two halves : Nature News & Comment

    www.nature.com/news/the-split-brain-a-tale-of-two-halves-1.10213

    Mar 14, 2012 - “The split work really showed that the two hemispheres are both very competent at ... the information solely to the intended hemisphere (see 'Of two minds').... split-brain patients — have a unified sense of self and mental life.

    Split-brain - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Split-brain

    Having two "brains" in one body can create some interesting dilemmas. ... twohemispheres of their brain surgically disconnected, are 'of two minds'" (Zilmer, 2001)..... to which split-brain patients exhibit two uneven streams of self-awareness;  ...

    What happens when your brain is split in two - and you ... - io9

    io9.com/.../what-happens-when-your-brain-is-split-in-two---and-you-sur...

    Dec 26, 2011 - You just don't notice, because between the two of those minds, you almost ... The most famous split-brain patient's left hand hated his wife. ... You can find plenty of medical articles about the conditions themselves, however.

    Split-brain patients and the dire implications for the soul ...

    theskepticalzone.com/.../split-brain-patients-and-the-dire-implications-for...

    Jun 1, 2013 - Surely the immaterial mind doesn't split in two at the moment the corpus callosum is cut, .... They say that there are two selves in a split brain.

    [PDF]Two Brains, Two Minds? - Julian Jaynes Society

    www.julianjaynes.org/pdf/puccetti_two-brains-two-minds-wigan.pdf

    by R PUCCETTI - ‎Cited by 9 - ‎Related articles
    3 Evidence for Double Mindedness in Split—Brain Patients. 4 Wigan's Mis-statement of ... necessarily that if we have two brains we have two minds, anymore than it ....selves never display such bifurcated behaviour, there is no doubt we are.

    Study Finds Two Minds in Every Brain - Harvard University

    news.harvard.edu/gazette/1998/11.12/brain.html

    Schiffer has found evidence that each half of the human brain has different feelings, ...that people who never undergo split-brain surgery have two minds in their heads. ...These patients all had a left hemisphere with diminished self-esteem.

    Split-brain studies and splitting of consciousness

    www.legiontheory.com/split-brain.html

    By that we meant that the human brain could be thought of as comprising twohemispheres. In this section we're ... Why are split-brain patients so 'normal'?

    Split Brain Studies: One Mind per Hemisphere

    www.humantruth.info/split_brain.html

    Jun 6, 2015 - We then discuss split-brain patients and the implications that dual-personality phenomenon have for those who stand by a soul-orientated  ...

    One's Other Mind - Caltech

    www.its.caltech.edu/~jbogen/text/onesothe.htm

    Thehuman split-brain results can be summarized in two main conclusions: 1) ..... of mental duality (especially for themselves)prefer the committee view of mind  ...

    Split-Brain Patients Reveal Brain's Flexibility - Scientific ...

    www.scientificamerican.com › ... › Mind in Pictures

    Feb 14, 2013 - Split-Brain Patients Reveal Brain's Flexibility. By Dwayne ... This article was originally published with the title "Of Two Minds." Buy this digital  ...

Posted by Helmer von Helvete at 3:08 PM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest

Jayarava's Raves: Rebirth is Neither Plausible nor Salient.

Jayarava's Raves: Rebirth is Neither Plausible nor Salient.: The idea of anything surviving the death of the body, and in particular the death of the brain, seems so incredibly unlikely that I no longer find any afterlife theory plausible. ...

[...] Neuro-anatomical investigation shows us that mental activity is inseparable from brain activity. Even in the case where mental activity does seem disembodied—e.g. the out-of-body experience  (OBE)—scientists have shown that electrical stimulation of the angular gyrus, on the tempero-parietal junction, will create this precise effect. We now have plausible explanations for how the sense of self may be disrupted in such a way as the ego is perceived to be connected to the felt sense of the body, but disconnected from visual sense, all the while remaining tightly correlated with brain activity.

Thomas Metzinger, however, has observed that having had an OBE the overwhelming temptation is to conclude that consciousness is not tied to the body: i.e. to believe in a strong form of mind/body dualism. I would add that even those who haven't had the experience personally are tempted by the testimony of those who have. The conclusions of neuroscientists, however, are profoundly non-dualistic: there is no separation between brain function and consciousness, they are manifestations of the same process.

[...] When reasoning we use emotion to assign value to facts. Antonio Damasio describes a patient with damage to the emotion centres in the pre-frontal lobe, but whose intellect is otherwise intact. Asked to make a decision they cannot do so because they cannot assign value to facts, they get caught up in an endless exploration of the available facts without ever coming to a conclusion.

The strength of emotion around death makes us weigh facts in a biased way: for instance we see the corpse of a loved one, but cannot accept that they have simply ceased to be, so we imagine that their consciousness (or their soul) lives on in some disembodied state.

When we combine all of these observations we can begin to see the dynamic that is at work:

We believe a priori:

1) that self-awareness is not tied to the body, so the idea that 'something' survives death and continues to 'live' seems plausible;

2) that emotional weighting of facts makes this seem probable, and the finality of death improbable;

3) and since we don't want to believe in death, post-mortem survival seems preferable.

We make the leap from preferable to actually true, and it feels satisfying because we have resolved the dissonance and been consistent with our other beliefs.





Posted by Helmer von Helvete at 12:12 PM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest

Jayarava's Raves: There is No Life After Death, Sorry.

Jayarava's Raves: There is No Life After Death, Sorry.: In this essay, I begin with a longish introduction in which I recap some important points made in previous essays about the idea of life ...

According to Jayarava, the dynamic of afterlife beliefs is like this:

1) The fact of universal death creates cognitive dissonance.

2) According to testimony, certain experiences appear to demonstrate that consciousness is not tied to the body, but can exist independently.

3) So the idea that something might survive the death of the body and continue to "live" seems plausible.

4) Emotional weighting of facts (salience) makes this seem probable, and the finality of death improbable.

5) Since the finality of death causes intense cognitive dissonance, post-mortem survival seems preferable.

6) We make the leap from probable/preferable to actually true; and it feels satisfying because we have resolved the dissonance created by the fact of death and been consistent with our other beliefs.


Posted by Helmer von Helvete at 11:56 AM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest

Monday, August 3, 2015

Respectful Atheist's take on a phenomenon usually called patternicity

Respectful Atheist: Patternicity: There are a handful of others, who played heavily into my de-conversion, that I have thus far barely mentioned here on the Respectful Atheist blog....

Patternicity can be defined as the tendency to find meaningful patterns in both meaningful and meaningless noise.

Our pattern seeking behaviors are closely related to magical & religious thinking a.k.a. the brain's oldest Information Processing System built on emotional, intuitive, associative, and illogical "reasoning" so typical for children and adult woos.

The patterns we perceive are not always real. Actually there are two types of pattern related errors,


1) Type I Error a.k.a. false positive patterns, i.e. when we believe a pattern is real although it's not (meaning we've found a nonexistent pattern)

2) Type II Error a.k.a. false negative patterns, i.e. when we believe a pattern isn't real although it actually is (meaning we've not recognized a real and existing pattern)
Posted by Helmer von Helvete at 3:05 AM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Newer Posts Older Posts Home
Subscribe to: Comments (Atom)

About Me

Helmer von Helvete
I don't believe in gods, angels, demons, ghosts or other spiritual & hidden causal agents. But I'm very interested in magical, occult, supernatural, paranormal and spiritual phenomena and how they can be explained by neuroscience instead of emotional, associative, illogical, intuitive magical and (pseudo)religious woo-ish bullshit thinking.
View my complete profile

Blog Archive

  • ►  2016 (1)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ▼  2015 (8)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ▼  August (7)
      • Explanatory Theories of Religion (by Cris Campbell)
      • Rosa Rubicondior: So I've Written This Book...
      • Interested in what OCD means and how this evil dis...
      • The odd way split-brain patients perceive and expe...
      • Jayarava's Raves: Rebirth is Neither Plausible nor...
      • Jayarava's Raves: There is No Life After Death, So...
      • Respectful Atheist's take on a phenomenon usually ...
  • ►  2010 (9)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (7)
    • ►  August (1)
Simple theme. Powered by Blogger.